Northwest ISD

2015-2016 Health Insurance Plans

(Click on the links to see a detailed Wacasey Equation analysis of each coverage level)

Employee

Wacasey Equation Analyses - Tarrant ISD's 2015-2016.xlsx

Employee + Spouse

Wacasey Equation Analyses - Tarrant ISD's 2015-2016.xlsx

Employee + Child(ren)

Wacasey Equation Analyses - Tarrant ISD's 2015-2016.xlsx

Employee + Family

Wacasey Equation Analyses - Tarrant ISD's 2015-2016.xlsx

Northwest ISD offers three self funded plans, and the district subsidizes $275 per month, regardless of which plan is chosen.

As can be seen from the spreadsheet, the HDHP plans have the lowest premiums (or P), and make the most economic sense from the standpoint of staying well. But what if the insured should suffer a serious illness or injury, and reach their out of pocket maximum (O)? 

With The Wacasey Equation, adding these two variables gives WHAT (W) might be spent on health insurance AND health care during the plan year:

P + O = W 

In comparing the W for the HDHP plans to the other policies, for the Employee category these lower priced plans offer the best value, both in sickness and in health. Interestingly though, the W for the Employee + Spouse, Employee + Child(ren) and Employee + Family categories is actually lower for the Basic plans.

But, although these plans may end up saving you money on the W in the (statistically unlikely) event of a catastrophe, how much more do they cost in the first place?

Let’s examine the difference in P‘s, compared to the potential savings on the W:

  • An Employee + Spouse would pay $1,800 more in Premiums, to potentially save $400 on What might be spent.
  • An Employee + Child(ren) would pay $1,872 more in Premiums, to potentially save $328 on What might be spent.
  • An Employee + Family would pay $2,220 more in Premiums, to potentially save $20 on What might be spent.

So, the ends don’t always justify the means, and one can waste plenty of money buying the so-called “better” health insurance. Think of it this way: would you hand a Vegas casino $2,220 to sit for a poker hand worth $20?!?

To see a detailed Wacasey Equation analysis of each coverage level, click on the link above each box.